 |
| Reporter : Roy L. Mardani |
THE CLOSING Statement of candidate pair, Samsurizal
Tombolotutu – Badrun Nggai (SABAR) for the voters in Parigi Moutong elections
to be more intelligent and to vote for ID cards and local boys to protest. The
statement was disclosed when closing the Public Debate event last week in
Siendeng Village, Bolano Lambunu Sub-district.
Tombolotutu – Badrun Nggai (SABAR) for the voters in Parigi Moutong elections
to be more intelligent and to vote for ID cards and local boys to protest. The
statement was disclosed when closing the Public Debate event last week in
Siendeng Village, Bolano Lambunu Sub-district.
As it is known, closing the second round debate, each
candidate pair is given a moderator opportunity to provide the closing
statement. The practical room of the debate was tense and somewhat rowdy by
shouts of supporters.
candidate pair is given a moderator opportunity to provide the closing
statement. The practical room of the debate was tense and somewhat rowdy by
shouts of supporters.
The criticism and sharp spotlight were instantly sprung
from the supporters of Erwin Burase – Rahmawati M. Nur (ERA-BARU) and H.
Amrullah Ahmadali -Hj. Yufni Bungkudampu (AMIN). The criticism of a number of
supporters of ERA-Baru and AMIN is not without reason, but because of where in
the closing statement, SABAR tells people to be more intelligent and choose
candidates who have identity card and the original son of Parigi Moutong
(Parmout).
from the supporters of Erwin Burase – Rahmawati M. Nur (ERA-BARU) and H.
Amrullah Ahmadali -Hj. Yufni Bungkudampu (AMIN). The criticism of a number of
supporters of ERA-Baru and AMIN is not without reason, but because of where in
the closing statement, SABAR tells people to be more intelligent and choose
candidates who have identity card and the original son of Parigi Moutong
(Parmout).
In fact, the candidate pair, SABAR’s statement was
immediately responded by the supporters of ERA-BARU and AMIN at the end of the
second round of public debate. In fact, one of the ERA-NEW supporters shouted
for the candidate pair SABAR to be expelled from the candidate’s candidates
because he was considered to be issuing words that were considered to contain
SARA issues and did not provide good political education.
immediately responded by the supporters of ERA-BARU and AMIN at the end of the
second round of public debate. In fact, one of the ERA-NEW supporters shouted
for the candidate pair SABAR to be expelled from the candidate’s candidates
because he was considered to be issuing words that were considered to contain
SARA issues and did not provide good political education.
According to Riswan who is one of the winning team of the
candidate pair, AMIN said, in the local election of Parmout community basically
chose a leader not from the domicile. In fact, the statement conveyed by the
candidate pair SABAR it was considered very provocative. Thus, it is natural
that the statement immediately reap the reaction of AMIN and ERA-NEW
supporters. “Supposedly, the supervisory committee immediately addressed
it and gave a reprimand when it saw it. If it is necessary to be disqualified
from the participants because the statement is not very educative, “he
said.
candidate pair, AMIN said, in the local election of Parmout community basically
chose a leader not from the domicile. In fact, the statement conveyed by the
candidate pair SABAR it was considered very provocative. Thus, it is natural
that the statement immediately reap the reaction of AMIN and ERA-NEW
supporters. “Supposedly, the supervisory committee immediately addressed
it and gave a reprimand when it saw it. If it is necessary to be disqualified
from the participants because the statement is not very educative, “he
said.
In response, Samsurizal Tombolotutu said, the people
should choose a person who is domiciled in Parmout. Asked whether his statement
was whether it was a violation or not, Samsurizal firmly admitted that it was
not an offense.
should choose a person who is domiciled in Parmout. Asked whether his statement
was whether it was a violation or not, Samsurizal firmly admitted that it was
not an offense.
In fact, what he submitted to the closing statement is
part of the the candidate pair SABAR speech campaign because it is clearly a
fact. According to him, the statement does not offend the individual and it is
considered reasonable. “Unless I mention A or B, it’s not natural. The
citizens of Parmout, must choose Parmout’s ID card, “he explained.
part of the the candidate pair SABAR speech campaign because it is clearly a
fact. According to him, the statement does not offend the individual and it is
considered reasonable. “Unless I mention A or B, it’s not natural. The
citizens of Parmout, must choose Parmout’s ID card, “he explained.
Meanwhile, the Coordinator of Legal Division and Action of
Panwaslu Parmout, Iskandar Mardani said, it will be reviewed again by it. Similarly,
the candidate pair’s submission is criticized at the first public debate, held
in Sausu Sub-district, from word-to-word and sentence meaning.
Panwaslu Parmout, Iskandar Mardani said, it will be reviewed again by it. Similarly,
the candidate pair’s submission is criticized at the first public debate, held
in Sausu Sub-district, from word-to-word and sentence meaning.
In fact, to conduct an assessment of the statements
submitted by the candidate pair is a mandatory task of Electoral Supervisory
Committee (“Panwaslu”). Asked if there was evidence of a violation that
occurred later, Iskandar explained, in accordance with Bawaslu 14 Rules,
whether it is included in the administrative domain, code of ethics or could be
into the criminal realm.
submitted by the candidate pair is a mandatory task of Electoral Supervisory
Committee (“Panwaslu”). Asked if there was evidence of a violation that
occurred later, Iskandar explained, in accordance with Bawaslu 14 Rules,
whether it is included in the administrative domain, code of ethics or could be
into the criminal realm.
By him, he was very hopeful, in the third round of debate
later, the discussion in accordance with the theme. ‘’It will be seen, what kind of results they
are. Moreover, before the implementation of the third public debate, there will
be a coordination meeting,’’ he
said.**
later, the discussion in accordance with the theme. ‘’It will be seen, what kind of results they
are. Moreover, before the implementation of the third public debate, there will
be a coordination meeting,’’ he
said.**
